A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out involving prospective neighbours about the development of a wall in a coastal web page in a very north Dublin suburb, a situation that has attracted national notice adhering to an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed spouse and children property at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of scheduling breaches, environmental issues, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Times post about René Collier plus the Irish Situations post about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as an area disagreement has progressed right into a highly publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about construction will work at the internet site on Dublin Road, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a corporation director respectively, seek to create their spouse and children property. The situation has grown to be emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, the place improvement pressures collide with environmental protections and also the sensitivities of proven people. In accordance with the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall being manufactured by their potential neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted underneath preparing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, each residents of Dublin Highway, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their setting up permission by building a wall further than the boundaries of their internet site, leading to an encroachment on the Unique Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central on the dispute, as a result areas are matter to demanding controls under European and Irish environmental law. In their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments could have lasting ecological penalties, especially inside a sensitive coastal natural environment such as Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach of their setting up authorization, and say the wall, which is partly built, is in the right situation. Their legal crew has characterised the motion as an try to hold off or frustrate a lawful growth. The pair accuse litigants of looking for to halt homebuilding to be able to maintain their check out, an allegation that's been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the case. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal scheduling disputes, the place views of The ocean are both equally remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained extraordinary endeavours by the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the location, In line with sworn proof referenced while in the Irish Instances. In a single account, Rene Collier waded through waistline-substantial drinking water in the course of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Occasions, an image which has because become emblematic of your intensity of the dispute. These steps were not merely symbolic; they have been intended to Collect Visible evidence of your wall’s posture relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location within the sea Irish Moments documented, describing how The 2 Males entered the water all through critical weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm h2o to photograph the positioning turned One of the more placing descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Occasions write-up about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that these types of actions were cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ belief which the wall extended into a place impacted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was getting encroached upon.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been coated intimately with the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Situations January 27 2026 turned broadly searched phrases as viewers sought to comprehend the Paul Feely and Rene Collier history and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court heard even further submissions on no matter if interim orders needs to be granted to halt building pending an entire hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital minute within the legal timeline.
On the Main with the dispute is really a disagreement around boundaries, organizing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely manage that the wall, as built, goes further than what was accredited and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has actually been called meticulous in his evaluation of scheduling documents, maps, and disorders hooked up towards the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have equally pressured that their action is inspired by worry for environmental defense and adherence to preparing law. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private watch, insisting alternatively that it is about making sure that improvement at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they have got described their lengthy-standing connection to the world as well as their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On another facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a couple simply just endeavoring to create a relatives property in accordance Together with the regulation. They deny the wall encroaches over a Special Location of Conservation and say that all will work are already performed determined by Expert advice and accredited ideas. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes coming into The ocean throughout a storm, will not alter the fundamental points.
The situation has also raised broader questions on how setting up disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute about building of wall at coastal website happens to be a shorthand description for any scenario that a lot of observers see as ever more frequent. As sea concentrations rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation concerning non-public land, general public foreshore, and guarded habitats is becoming additional contentious.
The Irish Moments write-up about René Collier pointed out which the businessman experienced Formerly been associated with community advocacy on organizing and environmental challenges, however not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Moments write-up about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from pretty diverse Qualified backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in these types of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, have become synonymous With all the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site in the sea Irish Moments coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by waist-large water for the duration of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Situations and René Collier waded by way of waist-higher h2o throughout a storm to photograph the location Irish Times are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting each the physical actuality of your coastline along with the symbolic mother nature of your act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these actions shown commitment; for critics, they illustrated the things they see being an too much solution.
As being the High Court proceedings keep on, the outcome stays unsure. The court ought to decide whether or not the wall as developed complies with scheduling permission and irrespective of whether any encroachment into a Special Place of Conservation has transpired. The authorized arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal info, and organizing circumstances. However the human element continues to be central: neighbours who have to Reside together with each other lengthy once the legal costs are actually paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around building functions at the internet site on Dublin Road, Sutton, though the implications of the case extend outside of that address. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the necessity of clarity in preparing permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. Additionally, it underscores how speedily a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when elementary issues for instance environmental security and assets rights are perceived to get at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand remains a location of natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre from the dispute stands partly crafted, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved legal questions. Whether or not it will in the long run be altered, taken out, or done as planned will depend upon the court docket’s conclusions. Right up until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will likely proceed to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to Probably the most carefully viewed scheduling disputes in north Dublin recently.