A bitter High Court dispute has broken out concerning potential neighbours more than the construction of the wall in a coastal web-site in a north Dublin suburb, a situation which includes captivated countrywide focus next an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed spouse and children residence at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of planning breaches, environmental issues, and prolonged-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Situations article about René Collier as well as the Irish Instances report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has developed right into a extremely publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over construction works at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a business director respectively, request to make their spouse and children dwelling. The situation is becoming emblematic of wider disputes together Ireland’s coastline, in which improvement pressures collide with environmental protections and also the sensitivities of established inhabitants. Based on the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall remaining produced by their possible neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted underneath organizing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally residents of Dublin Highway, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases of their setting up permission by creating a wall beyond the boundaries of their site, resulting in an encroachment with a Specific Area of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to your dispute, therefore places are issue to rigid controls less than European and Irish environmental law. Inside their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments might have Long lasting ecological implications, specially inside a sensitive coastal ecosystem like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny These are in breach in their planning permission, and say the wall, that's partly crafted, is in the correct place. Their authorized crew has characterised the motion being an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful enhancement. The pair accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding as a way to maintain their check out, an allegation which has been recurring in court and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of many coastal arranging disputes, where views of the sea are both equally extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained dramatic attempts because of the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, In keeping with sworn proof referenced in the Irish Instances. In one account, Rene Collier waded by way of midsection-superior h2o throughout a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Moments, an image which has considering that come to be emblematic of your depth of your dispute. These steps weren't simply symbolic; they have been intended to Obtain visual proof of your wall’s posture relative to tidal strains and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning through the sea Irish Moments documented, describing how the two Males entered the h2o all through critical weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm h2o to photograph the location grew to become Probably the most striking descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Situations short article about accountant Paul Feely famous that this sort of steps have been cited to show the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall prolonged into an area afflicted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument which the SAC was getting encroached on.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were protected in detail with the countrywide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Situations 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 turned extensively searched phrases as audience sought to comprehend the history and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court listened to further submissions on no matter if interim orders ought to be granted to halt development pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked Paul Feely accountant a important second during the legal timeline.
On the Main of your dispute is really a disagreement in excess of boundaries, setting up compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain that the wall, as built, goes over and above what was permitted and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, is referred to as meticulous in his examination of organizing paperwork, maps, and problems connected on the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two pressured that their action is enthusiastic by problem for environmental safety and adherence to preparing regulation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private look at, insisting in its place that it's about ensuring that progress at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they have explained their prolonged-standing relationship to the realm and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On another side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a couple only wanting to establish a loved ones dwelling in accordance While using the law. They deny that the wall encroaches on a Distinctive Location of Conservation and say that every one works have been completed dependant on Skilled tips and authorised ideas. Their lawyers have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the extraordinary actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as moving into the sea in the course of a storm, will not change the fundamental facts.
The case has also elevated broader questions on how scheduling disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute over building of wall at coastal web page has grown to be a shorthand description for just a problem that many observers see as increasingly common. As sea levels increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation in between private land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become much more contentious.
The Irish Times posting about René Collier observed that the businessman experienced Formerly been linked to nearby advocacy on organizing and environmental challenges, even though not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Periods write-up about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from incredibly distinct professional backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in these disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, are getting to be synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location in the sea Irish Moments protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by midsection-large drinking water during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations and René Collier waded by means of waistline-superior water in the course of a storm to photograph the location Irish Times are phrases that appeared frequently in coverage, reflecting equally the Actual physical truth of the coastline as well as the symbolic character on the act. For supporters with the plaintiffs, these steps shown determination; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see as an extreme solution.
Because the High Court proceedings keep on, the outcome continues to be unsure. The court docket will have to establish whether or not the wall as designed complies with organizing permission and whether or not any encroachment right into a Exclusive Place of Conservation has transpired. The authorized arguments are elaborate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and arranging circumstances. Nonetheless the human element continues to be central: neighbours who must Reside along with one another prolonged following the legal expenditures are already paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around construction performs at the location on Dublin Street, Sutton, even so the implications of the case increase outside of that deal with. For planners, builders, and people alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the necessity of clarity in organizing permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. Additionally, it underscores how swiftly a local disagreement can escalate when fundamental troubles for example environmental security and property legal rights are perceived being at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be an area of normal magnificence and contested boundaries. The wall with the centre in the dispute stands partially created, a physical manifestation of unresolved lawful inquiries. No matter if it will eventually ultimately be altered, taken off, or finished as planned will count on the court’s findings. Until eventually then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will likely keep on to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to One of the more intently viewed planning disputes in north Dublin in recent years.